Why can't this man be president

ask Kwami why Bernie hid himself from the vote for the wars. but paid for them anyway ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::

2 Canadians


Ramesh missing looks like he don't get into politics

I did not and don't really want to bother about this captain but Kwami up on a high horse he shud not be riding at all.

how in the hell come a man like Kwami, into american politics like he is...in support of candidates in their elections...american politics, a wholly owned Jewish enterprise?

Kwami musta bounced his head. there is nothing in there for him or I..absolutely nutten in that rigged zero sum game.  it is zero sum but it is not a free for all.  the man has rigged it in his favor so completely that there will always and ever be one outcome at any juncture in the process..the one he wants.  yet he is pulling for a candidate who in he end must be for the system in and of which he lives...a system that depends entirely on the complete and exhaustive exploitation of people like Kwami and myself.

Kwami must be completely deluded

I don't know why you are surprised that I am into American politics. I got news for you,I am also into international politics.
Getting back  to american politics,  Knowledge  of American politics is important as long as the dollar is the reserve currency .International economics  is affected by American domestic  politics. A real cheap shot to suggest  that I some how hit my head and is delusional .
Bernie Sanders might be all that you imply but  he is the only presidential candidate that  is  espousing progressive rhetoric

no cheap shot!  where do you see cheap shot ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::

you miss the point.  yes we must be into american politics but we ought not to be into it with  such a point of view as you expose here. that to me makes no sense and is inconsistent with the necessary logic involved.

talk is cheap.  Sanders can say what the hell he likes but he has no tract record to match his current program.  after 40 years he must have something more than he does now.

but that is still not the point.  the point is we know capitalism and what it will take to change it to make a better deal for all alive in the world.  Sanders does not represent that. no american does..and no one will from inside the system.

there  can be no progressive change from inside the system.  there are too many checks and balances that would stop all such effort from inside.  that is the problem with structures.  they can be captured and turned into the opposite to what it came into being to do.  life is dialectical, many sided and any side of any reality can be manipulated into being.government came into being to represent the interest of the people and has  been turned into its opposite to represent the interest of a minority

that minority has established a totalitarianism that is complete and our interest is not represented on the inside and no one politician can change that from the inside.  it must be a movement from the outside and from the boom up that confronts the minority totalitarianism with more power than it has, takes over, guts the totalitarianism and elongates a new way of doing the nations business that represents their own interests, the popular interest not the minority.

that is the only way forward..popular uprising that washes away the status.  all the Obama, Sanders, Clinton thing is nonsense..capitalism games to keep the people quiet

that is why I ask, what you called a cheap shot.  that is not cheap shot.  you give the impression you do not know what you are dealing with when I have read where you have spoken at a much more sophisticated level before.  that is why I asked if you bounced your head.

Sanders can and will do nothing as president.  assume that he is for real and he is bent on changing things..that is by simple reform..like bank control, or proper taxation..or seeking to tax american jobs back home from overseas..who will he appoint to do that work ::confused::

he will not be able to get even 1 solitary progressive appointment approved by the various congressional committees responsible for approval of appointments.  the corporations/bankers have control of all of that. nothing can and will take place that they do not want.  the president can do what the hell he wants to, or try to.  he will get nowhere.

so forget the electoral politics.  it means nothing at all save a pappyshow for the people. so why would I have a choice..why would I listen to talk when I know that that talk can only mean nothing.

it however may not be impossible for a man to come from the outside..but he must raise the people up..the people and their issues..and when I say raise up I mean raise up. they must be ready willing and able to tear the place apart if necessary..arrest them all , try them summarily and execute the lot of them if necessary.

the man with the people come from the outside and force them to run a clean election.. that is get rid of the Diebold voting machines and back to ballot boxes.  he wins and with the people ready, milling about washington proceed to carry though a revolution.  the committees must vote properly or face arrest.

in fact they will all  be arrested as soon as the new president is sworn in. in fact between the election and swearing in a lot can happen..will happen because they all would be aware of what is coming.  but they people must be ready to impose their will on the situation

that can happen..or the people rise up and put an end to it immediately.  but you will get nothing through the system, from Washigton and from Sanders.  that is  what I meant.  that is what I thought you knew