+- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com)
+-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Ban bouncers? (/thread-21813.html)
Re: Ban bouncers? - mapoui - 12-02-2014
[quote author=Goog Lee link=topic=94299.msg602288#msg602288 date=1417552540]
of course not!
next you will claim that if the ball was white, this accident would have not happened! >
[/quote]
dont be ridiculous. where did Ramesh say he hated the dead white man..or held him responsible for any dam thing relative to black people?
he made a comment relative to general world reality that is absolutely true. such a comment walks with its own validity and because it is so sorrowful and destructive of human beings, it cannot be said in insensitivity near to anyone or near any dam event!
Ramesh stated what he believed to be true. it is in fact true no matter who dead, then and now. if allyuh accept that truth all would be well. but because a white man dead the truth said nearby is insensitive. nonsense!
is that as insensitive as a white Jury letting a killer corp do and a black man ded..the second one in recent times in a public court case?
how much insensitivity for we nig nogs then when we dead..ed murdered. I never see none ah allyuh here express any dam, blasted concern for the black people who get killed in the USA and anywhere at all. but a black man ded because of the exploitation of a helmet company that makes an un-protective helmet and to point out a truism it is insensitive to this white man.
who the rarse is this white man then that he is now a saint and no one can say a dam thing near him or thought to be insensitive ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
he is just an ordinary regular Oz cricketer who was unfortunate to meet an accident too early in his life, abetted by the helmet greeds. who the hell is he that his mere death puts a hold and limitation on free, truthful speech ::confused:: ::confused::
I have nothing against Hughes. he is{was} a human being and his death must be mourned and the lesson in it learned and effected. and I have been fighting to for just that..to ensure that no more cricketers are so exposed ever again. but we cant go overboard and put the knuckles on Ramesh because we do not like his observation at this time. sorry if allyuh dont like it but there is nothing wrong or insensitive about Ramesh's comment!
>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: Ban bouncers? - ketchim - 12-02-2014
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=94299.msg602291#msg602291 date=1417553537]
but because a white man dead [size=10pt]the truth said is insensitive.[/size]
[/quote]
well white Life is more valuable than a brown man in India life or the expat
Israeli captain/ umpire Life....
I jokingly said we will find out If Trini Phil Simmons head was harder than an Aussie head.
Chap died that night and i felt like a heel
Re: Ban bouncers? - Googley - 12-02-2014
Look, Ramesh was wrong with his comment.
No one, i repeast, NO ONE would have asked for more bouncers if a non white batsman was hit!
plenty non white batsmen got hit in the past.....I never heard anyone say "bowl more bouncers"
Re: Ban bouncers? - mapoui - 12-02-2014
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=94299.msg602292#msg602292 date=1417553662]
well white Life is more valuable than a brown man in India life or the expat
Israeli captain/ umpire Life....
I jokingly said we will find out If Trini Phil Simmons head was harder than an Aussie head.
Chap died that night and i felt like a heel
[/quote]
well I imagine so but you had nutten to do with that...pure coincidence.
all them so sensitive about what Ramesh said I wonder how angry they are about the helmets and what they will do to make sure they get better. if we really want to honor Hughes it is to effect the lesson learned by his death..fix the blasted helmets
I will be looking to see if they join dat fight..googs and downunda most significantly. hypocrites >
>
Re: Ban bouncers? - mapoui - 12-02-2014
[quote author=Goog Lee link=topic=94299.msg602293#msg602293 date=1417554008]
Look, Ramesh was wrong with his comment.
No one, i repeast, NO ONE would have asked for more bouncers if a non white batsman was hit!
plenty non white batsmen got hit in the past.....I never heard anyone say "bowl more bouncers"
[/quote]
hush googley. say no more. you looking bad enuff as it is. yuh lorse. yuh have no case. Ramesh was not wrong. he did not call for more bouncers. he said nutten wrong, called for nutten... just concluded on current racial reality based on solid historical experience
Re: Ban bouncers? - Googley - 12-02-2014
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=94299.msg602295#msg602295 date=1417554367]
hush googley. say no more. you looking bad enuff as it is. yuh lorse. yuh have no case.
[/quote]
hahahahaha, yeah you rite...I looking bad!
::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::
Re: Ban bouncers? - ketchim - 12-02-2014
I jokingly asked how Nari Contractor reacted to Frank Worrell blood :
no one SMH or blast me for "insensitive" ::LOL::
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=94195.msg601482#msg601482 date=1417020355]
Narriman got African blood ? ...hahahahaha
was it blue , red or black ::LOL::
[/quote]
Re: Ban bouncers? - mapoui - 12-02-2014
Frank was blue bllod..the elite of the elite.. although deh called him Bolsehvik ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::
Re: Ban bouncers? - ketchim - 12-02-2014
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=94299.msg602299#msg602299 date=1417554698]
Frank was blue bllod..the elite of the elite.. although deh called him Bolsehvik ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::
[/quote]
hahaha : Narriman was Muslim blood ::LOL:: ::LOL::
Re: Ban bouncers? - ketchim - 12-02-2014
Yuh Lie Googs : I hear you yelling at Bourda for Uton Dowe to BOUNCE to Kanhai ! :-[
[quote author=Goog Lee link=topic=94299.msg602293#msg602293 date=1417554008]
Look, Ramesh was wrong with his comment.
No one, i repeast, NO ONE would have asked for more bouncers if a non white batsman was hit!
plenty non white batsmen got hit in the past...I never heard anyone say "bowl more bouncers"
[/quote]