![]() |
|
West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston (/thread-18331.html) |
Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - boquiesse - 06-11-2014 [quote author=mapoui link=topic=90261.msg568721#msg568721 date=1402523048] well I willsleep on this! see what i come up with in the mawnin! :-[ :-[ :-[ [/quote] Selection is not the issue. What I mean is that you can replace all 11 players with any players you choose and the result will be the same. There's a good reason WI first class competition is referred to as "dung heap" Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - boquiesse - 06-11-2014 [quote author=mapoui link=topic=90261.msg568726#msg568726 date=1402523280] from the cupboard: Kraigg, Blackwood, Fudadin, Johnson..... Gayle Kraigg Fudadin Johnson Shive Blackwood Ramdin Jason Holder/C Braithwaite Narine Benn Taylor a start....... [/quote] I aint have a problem with that but is still loss coming up. Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - ketchim - 06-11-2014 Sarwan and Deo OR no fcuking Ws. Whaddabout this U numbskulls dont get ? :-\ Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - mapoui - 06-11-2014 Quote:Selection is not the issue. I know that man.I am dealing with it from an angle I think possible...the most progressive angle given that there is very little likelihood that there will be any reform from the bottom up at this point the problem is in the stupid bureaucratic nature of west indian administration that has grown up around west indies cricket since 1995. the bureaucracy has stiffed the game by substituting the interest of the state/bureaucracy for that of the cricket, at the expense of the players...and fans to this end the bureaucracy has assembled at factory Road the worst most amenable types of personnel to bureaucracy. they are all anti-player suck-up parasitic bureaucratic types, who squeeze the cricket and the players.. and their very presence discourages the attitude and performance of the team yet the players are responsible for their own professionalism and we cant let them walk for their poor play Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - chairman - 06-11-2014 [size=13px]Sodhi to Ramdin, [/size][/size][size=13px]FOUR[/size][/size][size=13px], tossed up, just outside off, and he's slog-swept that hard over midwicket[/size] Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - ketchim - 06-11-2014 [quote author=mapoui link=topic=90261.msg568730#msg568730 date=1402523921] [size=10pt]..the most progressive angle[/size] [/quote] which is forgiving Sarwan and Deo ...Arbitration awards : WICB suck it up and give these 2 dem spots in the XI
Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - ketchim - 06-11-2014 115 - 7 35.5 Craig to Roach, OUT KAJ Roach c †Watling b Craig 19 Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - chairman - 06-11-2014 could end today Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - ketchim - 06-11-2014 Yes ....4 overs Left Jerome Bennay and Shilly
Re: West Indies v New Zealand, 1st Test, Kingston - chairman - 06-11-2014 [size=13px]With that, Craig definitely has the best match figures by a New Zealand debutant. New Zealand, by the way, have requested the extra half-hour[/size] |