![]() |
|
Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - Printable Version +- Cricket Windies (https://cricketwindies.com) +-- Forum: Rally Around West Indies! (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: We don't like cricket. We love it. (https://cricketwindies.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? (/thread-37508.html) |
Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - zacaroni - 12-16-2017 Quote:Pundits never tire of mentioning the uniqueness of his technique: his grip; his “pick-up” in the region of gully; his excessive movement at the crease; and his tendency to walk across his stumps. Bowlers, not unreasonably, often think they should bowl straight to him thinking his bat, presumably coming down at an angle and therefore slightly across the line, makes him a prime candidate to be dismissed LBW. But he hardly misses a ball on his legs. West Indies pacer Jerome Taylor actually executed that plan to perfection at Sabina Park in July 2015. But by that Smith was 199. Cricketsoccer Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - timmyj51 - 12-16-2017 "How would you play this ball, Dr. Grace?" "How would I play it? Why, I'd put BAT TO BALL, sir, BAT TO BALL!" "I wuz ALWAYZ lookin' to hit the first ball fur six!" --Gordy G. Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-16-2017 This is all you need to know. Personal and individual stroke can blend in AFTER these are mastered ! [img ]http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40720000/gif/_40720040_batting_stroke_sel3_203.gif[/img] Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-16-2017 For example this is NOT found in ANY manual ! that so called DilScoop : There is also PADDLES [img ]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wUAKmhUOBcI/maxresdefault.jpg[/img] Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-16-2017 Individual style out of the textbook also include : Baldheads with Beards [img ]https://cdn.24.co.za/files/Cms/General/d/2698/4f6ccd36b15849799cd185ceba188069.jpg[/img] Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - timmyj51 - 12-16-2017 "Tekneek" according to KKKsauros: 45(x) = (x-y)+a2 x 5(b-c) "Tekneek" according to timmyj: "Hit...ball...in...frickin'....STANDS!!! :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-16-2017 Cricket is not BizBol : 3 'likit' and you are out
Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-17-2017 this is poor 'tekneek" ! Rohan Kanhai should not FALL on his butt after the HOOK (ball pitched on pinkish color on my diagram above) also, the wicketkeeper do NOT need to keep him yeye on the ball hahahaha [img ]http://guyana-cricket.com/sites/default/files/images/gc/Kanhai18Aug1966.jpg[/img] Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-17-2017 Quote: wrote Bradman. “.... and if the technique is going to prove the master of a playerFolks, this comment that the Bat is the master of the Ball is so dated that it should NOT be used ever again ! these days the BALL is the the king of the bat ~ discuss..... Is Too Much Emphasis Placed On Correct Technique? - ketchim - 12-17-2017 Shiv Chanderpaul rewrote that Bradman statement: by record crease occupation in Cricket history! https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2009/mar/19/shivnarine-chanderpaul-west-indies-cricket He is one of only four batsmen to have gone 1,000 minutes in Test matches without conceding his wicket but is the only person to have done so more than once. Chanderpaul has managed it four times. No other player in Test history has faced 1,000 consecutive deliveries without being dismissed. Only he and three others have averaged 100 in Tests in two different calendar years; he and Bradman are the only ones to do so in consecutive years. |