Six Sixes in an Over by Sir Gary Sobers
As i was surfing through for the match details found something interesting.It says,Malcolm Nash who bowled that fateful over used a sturridge ball to bowl to sobers,but at a recent auction in christie's they say it was a Duke and that it has been signed by sober's as well.Any idea what this is all about.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket...-used.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket...-used.html
Good observation BUT Garry did not really care about the Maker ;D
![[Image: _68646735_ball.jpg]](http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/68646000/jpg/_68646735_ball.jpg)
![[Image: _68646735_ball.jpg]](http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/68646000/jpg/_68646735_ball.jpg)
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=80084.msg574657#msg574657 date=1405089372]
Good observation BUT Garry did not really care about the Maker ;D
![[Image: _68646735_ball.jpg]](http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/68646000/jpg/_68646735_ball.jpg)
[/quote]
If they don't care about the make it amounts to fraudulent activity right.Then you could probabably sue christie's for selling a duplicate product.
Moreover they can't go by what sober's says,he only "hit" the ball,and never handled it,so we need to go by what Nash says right..??
I am a bit confused over this and curious to know more.
Good observation BUT Garry did not really care about the Maker ;D
![[Image: _68646735_ball.jpg]](http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/68646000/jpg/_68646735_ball.jpg)
[/quote]
If they don't care about the make it amounts to fraudulent activity right.Then you could probabably sue christie's for selling a duplicate product.
Moreover they can't go by what sober's says,he only "hit" the ball,and never handled it,so we need to go by what Nash says right..??
I am a bit confused over this and curious to know more.
From The Archives
Older threads about similar topics
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)