Do We Really Understand Swing?

zacaroni · 12-07-2016, 04:08 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
Quote:If memory serves, it was the third and final Test of the 2014-15 English tour of the Caribbean. Jerome Taylor, armed with new ball was bowling the fifth over of England’s second innings to Jonathan Trott. The fifth ball of the over was full, swung into the batsman slightly and struck him on his pads. An almighty roar went up, as did Billy Bowden’s crooked index finger. The batsman trotted off after consulting with his captain and opening partner, Alastair Cook, who advised against requesting a review. He was plumb.

Replays clearly showed that the delivery swung in to the right-handed batsman. Bafflingly, however, the seam was pointed in the direction of slip, strongly hinting that the delivery ought to have veered away from the right-handed batsman. So why did it swerve in the opposite direction? Why did this attempted out-swinger defy instructions and swing in instead?

The television commentators didn’t seem to understand what happened either. In the end they appeared to put it down to just one of those things that happens sometimes. Something similar, perhaps, to one spinning delivery turning and another going straight on; just some kind of natural variation.

But there is no such thing, at least as far as physical motion is concerned. Everything is explainable. Everything must follow Newton’s laws, the first of which states that “every object continues in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by some external force.”

Cricwizz

#2
Du Plessis antics may all have been in vain, according to Dr. Mehta.

“In my opinion, the use of a sugary substance does not provide any obvious advantage. The natural substances are good enough to do the job. So this whole issue of using sweets is more hype than anything else.”



no kidding  Smile

#3
Back in the mid 70s in Guyana we had the Inventor of Reverse swing

fellah named Randolph Ramnarace.

only man in history to play for ROW without being CAPPED by his Country

#4
zac, I just remembered something shared on this Forum

IF indeed Ramnarace was the Inventor of reverse swing circa late 60s.

and Colin Cowdrey spotted that and got him to play for ROW.


Would Dr. Mehta accept a variable quantity in his equation ?

rumor was that the fellow suffered from Kleptomania

a.k.a sticky fingers.

#5
I never heard the Ramnarace story before. I kinda like the word discovered rather than invented.

What team is ROW? Rest of the world?

#8
Quote:But there is no such thing, at least as far as physical motion is concerned. Everything is explainable. Everything must follow Newton’s laws, the first of which states that “every object continues in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by some external force.”

as far as I know newtons law is not a law as such, not the be all of any dam thing.  there is more in the atmos than newton ever imagined that alter anything he once thought..like the role of electricity and the real nature of gravity, which is a product of electric action and by no means the decisive factor in physics..electricity is.

the discovery of why the ball did opposite of the intention of the bowler, would be to know what was going on in the air that day and at that time..which does not appear to be impossible at all...by the methods of the 'Electric universe'

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)