Putin signs law banning

Battie adopting


President Vladimir Putin has signed a bill that sharply limits the adoption of Russian children by people from countries that allow same-sex marriage.
The new law prohibits adoption by same-sex foreign couples whose homeland recognizes their union as marriage, as well as by single people or unmarried couples from those countries.
A Kremlin statement said the measure is intended to guarantee children a "harmonious" upbringing and protect them from "complexes, emotional suffering and stress."
The bill signed Wednesday is the latest move by Russia to buck the Western trend toward greater acceptance of homosexuality. On Sunday, Putin approved a ban on giving children any information about gays.


Read more: www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/03/putin-s...ldren/#ixzz2Y12UhgHE

for this alone I wud give Putin a World Prize for humanity

Russia has been the most conservative part of Europe for many centuries.. (75% of the Russian land mass is in Asia, but 90% of the population is ethnic European).


The Russian Empire viewed homosexuality as a mental disease. The Soviet Union sent homosexuals to gulags. Now the Russian Federation is also viewing homosexuality as a negative influence.


Considering the havoc unleashed in countries like USA and Sweden as a result of blatant pro-homosexual propaganda, I have no option other than to support Putin.

the world homosexual movement driven by the american homosexual political lobby is part of Zionists plans to destabilise all societies the better to control them.

I am against all that that development actualises particularly child adoption by homosexual couples..and most particularly the adoption of black male children by homosexual male couples and singles.

male paedophillia is ingrained in most white societies.. and in some asian as well..millenia old and preserved over all this time by the religions of these regions..in the west by that human social atrocity, organised Catholicism.

that is why there is a major problem with male paedophillia in western societies. with the rise of organised religion the church criminalised such behaviour which was widespread and legal activity.  but the catholic church took it in and kept it safe, even as it criminalised such behaviour..which is why paedophillia has been discovered in such vast occurrence practised by the ministers of that church.

to put male children, unconnected by blood into the keeping of white male western homosexuals is to play with fire..especially little black boys.  that is a disaster in the making already..even where the male children are connected by blood.

I believe that most homosexuality is natural..not a choic orientation made by those who are homosexual.  as such their human rights must be respected and free to live and earn like everyone else.  but as such it is only so far general society can go in the respect of such human rights. 

what indeed are homosexual human rights ::confused::

the right of society setting up marriage for them?

I don't see that.  marriage as it is needs to be looked at with an eye to reform.  changes have been made where unions not made official in churches, or by state registers are recognised by governments.  it is in that area the question of homosexual marriage should be allowed to resolved itself and recognised by the state when it is necessary to do so.  if a pension is involved for example when one partner dies then it ought to be a simple question of establishing the partnership of the two people to grant such pension.

and all people must be as secure as possible in routine life so that the laws of social protection must be applied to all.  and enough laws are already established to accomplish this end.  if there is a problem it is in the application of these laws.  and the state is amiss here for the state is sectarian protecting the interest of only one section..the rich.at the expense of all others.

so the resolution of social protection lies in social reform of the state itself, removing the rich from power so that the state such as it becomes, can act in the interest of the society as a whole.

the homosexual issue has become a political issue spearheaded by powerful lobbies, which behave like an empire seeking to expand its power globally, forcing nations to pass laws and benefits for homosexuals worldwide.  as such from a position of being oppressed, organised homosexuals become oppressors themselves, forcing their lifestyle on society, globally, cutting across. long-standing cultural practices that help to balance society, resulting in social destabilisation.

what that amounts to is organised attack on human society globally.

who benefits from social breakdown...bankers.  who are the bankers...ZIONISTS!

Putin is absolutely right. 

Russian children adopted into the united states have been subjected to atrocity aplenty.  that alone is reason to have stopped it.  when one adds the homosexual issue reason for eliminating that trade goes off the charts.

humanity cannot go back to widespread and legal 'man/boy love' as the advocates of this activity call it.  Putin says no!  no more! and that is a major step in the right direction.  this problem must be brought to light in all its historical occurrence and solved, ended.

the most dispiriting aspect of this is that I do not see black leadership out there in defence of black children without parents subjected to adoption by white homosexuals. there used to be some activity on this social front.  now there appears to be none at all > > > >