Black Bush Polder devotees say statue leaking sindoor

So because they can measure the quantity of the sindoor means they have complied with scientific methodology and can concluded that its source is from a celestial deity inhabiting a $10 concrete statue?  What stupidity is this Bro?

They are ignorant precisely because they have done absolutely zero scientific inquiry to explain the phenomenon.  They have called the phenomenon a "miracle" which by definition puts it outside the scope of science or the scientific method.

At minimum, the scientific method would require a more rigoourous examination of the statue itself, including but not limited to, repeated observations in a controlled environment to test a clearly defined hypothesis. 



Measurement is one facet of the scientific method. 

What have you done to further the big bang theory? Like them you have done nothing...so then, are you by that estimation IGNORANT also?

Have you conducted rigorous examintaion? Or are you digesting and regurgitating your beliefs, like them?

Why do I have to examine the big bang theory?  It's findings (including evidence) are there for all to read.  You seem to have a problem with this theory.  Why don't you give us refutation including all the evidence and the results of all the testing of that evidence.

Where is the evidence for your miracle in Black Bush Polder?  None.  And that is the difference. 

Snoop Dawg...apparently it is not only me having a problem with the big bang....here you are as a real scientific proponent of the Big Bang.  ;D ;D ;D  Bai you are a joke.

Now take a look and READ SLOWLY ( I have come to the conclusion that you don't do so sufficinetly, based on the evidence on this MB)...from the article here is THE CONCLUSION below.

And for your benefit, I am also attaching the article....thank god for google...no pun intended.

And to boot our Black Bush folks have more to hang their hats on that you have a pot to piss in...I don't care what they believe, all I am saying is that they are more pragmatic, and can support their contentions with physical evidence...and even if they couldn't, they are still entitled to their beliefs, as you are to yours. To each dawg...his choice of bone!

nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/problems-with-big-bang-expanding.html



Conclusion

Each of these sets of problems could be, and in fact often are, dismissed as mere “anomalies” in an otherwise well-supported theory. But taken collectively they contradict all the predictions of the theory, leaving no support at all. The response of supporters of the Big Bang theory has been to continually add “parameters” to the theory to account for new discordant data. As a result, as Michael Disney has demonstrated, the theory, now with over 20 parameters to be adjusted, has never had any power to predict new results. So it lacks the basic hallmark of a sound scientific theory. Indeed, the recent, well-publicized results from the BiCEPS instrument has led many researchers to add yet more parameters to the theory to explain apparent contradictions between BiCEPS and Planck results.

In contrast, the data that contradicts the Big Bang theory can be explained far more simply with hypotheses that are consistent with a universe that had no beginning in time and no Big Bang.

dem squash long and fine !

Baigan short and black!!!!

Sindoor powdery and red....

Chair go buss he head!!!

why you talking about my squash like duh? 

Chair corrected himself...he says Baby Squash!