Less
More
-
Posts: 62472
-
Thank you received: 36
-
-
31 May 2014 14:20 #193513
by chairman
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
The Los Angeles Clippers may actually be Steve Ballmer’s least-bad deal. That’s not saying much given the former Microsoft chief executive’s acquisition track record. But television revenue means sports teams are no longer money pits. Even including the ego premium in the $2 billion price tag, buying the NBA franchise could work out better than aQuantive, Skype or Nokia.
The sale would represent a record price for the league. The implied valuation is almost 16 times revenue, according to Forbes magazine. By comparison, publicly traded Madison Square Garden, which owns the New York Knicks and Rangers along with the eponymous arena and TV networks, fetches a multiple of about three.
Even so, by most accounts the Clippers are also profitable. In sports, that’s a relatively new phenomenon. It used to be there was little more than an expensive prize to acquire while absorbing the net present value of operating losses in perpetuity.
The Clippers receive roughly $30 million a year from the NBA’s current eight-year national TV contract, a figure that could potentially double when a new deal is negotiated soon. And given what the Lakers and Dodgers have been able to command for local broadcasting rights, there’s additional upside for Ballmer’s new plaything. Of course, as the economic value of sports teams has grown, it has pushed their trophy value higher still.
When Donald Sterling bought the Clippers over three decades ago, they were a third-rate team in small-market San Diego. Though he was pressured into selling following his racist remarks, Sterling nevertheless has parlayed a $12.5 million investment into an impressive annualized return of about 17 percent.
Ballmer may struggle to match that figure, but wouldn’t necessarily need to do so to improve his M&A score sheet. Microsoft’s $6.3 billion purchase price of online advertising agency aQuantive under his stewardship in 2007 was mostly written off. The 2011 acquisition of Skype hasn’t obviously delivered on the $8.5 billion cost. And there’s no sign yet that buying Nokia for $7.2 billion last year will pay off, or even that it will remain a part of Microsoft’s strategy under the new boss. In that context, the Clippers could be a steal.
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
SeanM
-
-
Visitor
-
31 May 2014 21:02 #193578
by SeanM
I agree, many would say that Nokia was a bad purchase, but google purchased Motorolla, and as a result are doing great things not only on the web and with its software engineering (Android is the most popularly used mobile OS in the world) but with its hardware with motorolla being a key catalyst in its new Tablet and Phablet PC line up
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
Clippers may actually be Ballmer’s least-bad deal
Time to create page: 0.165 seconds