Less
More
-
Posts: 62472
-
Thank you received: 36
-
-
30 Aug 2014 18:19 #210239
by chairman
New Delhi sticks to traditional stand
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s first public comments since India called off high-level talks with Pakistan have left little doubt about New Delhi’s terms for engagement with Islamabad, officials say.
One, India has no hesitation to discuss any outstanding issue with Pakistan but it will be within the bilateral framework that has been established under the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration.
Secondly, India will not encourage any Pakistani bid to involve “secessionist elements†from Jammu & Kashmir in the dialogue with New Delhi though previous Indian governments, including that of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, might have looked askance at such engagements.
Officials said Pakistan must note the tone and tenor of Modi’s comment made to the Japanese media before he left for Japan.
By emphasising on the Simla Pact of 1972 and Lahore Declaration of 1999, Modi is making it clear that he is not putting any new condition for talks with Pakistan. But, he is again underlining India’s traditional position: issues between two nuclear neighbours must be settled bilaterally and there’s no role for any third party including the UN. Also, terrorism and talks cannot go together, officials said.
India had cancelled the talks scheduled for August 25 after the Pakistan high commissioner Abdul Basit invited Hurriyat leaders for dialogue before Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh’s scheduled departure for Pakistan.
According to a transcript posted on the website of the Ministry of External Affairs, Modi told the Japanese media ahead of his visit to Japan that Pakistan had made a “spectacle†of efforts to resolve outstanding issues between the two countries by engaging separatist Hurriyat leaders in dialogue ahead of the now cancelled foreign secretary-level talks.
Modi said India still desires peaceful, friendly and cooperative ties with Pakistan. “India has no hesitation to discuss any outstanding issue with Pakistan within the bilateral framework that has been established under the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration,†he said.
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
ramesh
-
-
Visitor
-
30 Aug 2014 18:27 #210242
by ramesh
Modi was complicit in the deaths of 2000 Muslims in Gujarat.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
wulfman
-
-
Visitor
-
01 Sep 2014 05:27 #210421
by wulfman
Lots of people said he violated human rights in his crackdown on Muslims in the riots in Gujarat. But if he did not do anything a lot more than 2000 would have died. Muslims were attacking Hindus at whim and burned a train of Hindu men, women, and children. Modi simply made a display of these bodies to say that this must not be tolerated. Hindus lashed out and the Muslims were put in their place. They must know that they are free to practice Islam but that this is a country run by Hindus. What do you think would have happened in Pakistan if Hindus behaved like this? Modi did nothing wrong.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
Modi sets terms for engagement with Pak
Time to create page: 0.298 seconds