I don't understand whats happening in Tampa Bay...how in the hell are they getting beaten-up like that. how in the hell Lovie Smith cant keep that team playing better?
I have a sense that it is the players, a lot whom date back to Rahim Morris and sucked all through Dominic Schiano. now they are getting beat out of the water again under Lovie Smith . it appears there is in Tampa a bad collection of players who wont play for anybody. there is a simple solution to that: CLEAN HOUSE.
IT DOES NOT MATTER TO ME AT THIS STAGE WHO IS WHO..WHY THEY WONT PLAY ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
BUT I DON'T CARE WHAT THE ANSWER IS. AS A TEAM OWNER OR AS OR A HEAD COACH, I AM NOT A SHRINK. GOOD MONEY IS BEING PAID TO PLAYERS TO PLAY. IT IS NOT ONE PLAYER BUT A WHOLE DEFENSE CONSISTENTLY LETTING DOWN.
IF THE MONEY IS NOT INCENTIVE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO PLAY PROFESSIONALLY THEN PISS OFF.
I WOULD START IMMEDIATELY CUTTING AND SITTING PLAYERS LEFT AND RIGHT. BY NEXT SEASON NOT ONE OF THE MORRIS/SCHIANO PLAYERS WOULD BE LEFT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF GLENNON. THE SITUATION MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL OTHERWISE.
I am on the players side but there is a level of compliance essential to keep the process going. no matter in what employment labour has to labour, to do the work before them, become excellent, professional, while constantly fighting the system, to the day when labour itelf, must take over industry and society entirely. labouring is a process of human development that prepares labour for the job of democratizing society. for the role of social leadership. we cant have stupid, incapable and emotional bozos leading running things
professional american sports..indeed professional sports globally.. is an exploitative business. global society on the whole is zero sum. that is why I have established my principle, that the goal of players must be studiously going after the money, the biggest and best salary they can muster on their level of skill and professionalism, and consistent excellence they can muster all the way through. that must be the goal for them. they are in a business and any other approach leaves them vulnerable to massive exploitation.
a misguided approach would be to sacrifice salary for the purpose of building a winning team. that is a silly and most injurious approach by the players. the players are not responsible for producing winning teams. the owners and the coaching staff they hire are. and if the players are required to sacrifice salary to create a winning team, then the owners must sacrifice first.. and much more money, like 150% from their profits to each percent the players must give back.
but the fact is..if the owners did not establish salary caps and paid players up front there would be high performing teams all along the way, throughout sports. salary caps and player sacrifice would not be necessary. these are anti labour practices meant to shut down players, to harm their interest..to cast them as greedy and evil in the public eye..to score big in the facilitation of total owner dominance of the entire process, including players..a natural outcome or goal of owners, in owner/labour relations in professional sports
but what players are responsible for in the process, must to give in the process they must not shy from. they must give and take their chances properly, always forcing changes in favour or labour. there must be no tolerance for players effing the dog because they 'do not like a coach, or find that coach is soft and exploitable, and so they exploit him and refuse to give of their best, destroying that coach's career. such emotion has no place in professional sports...in professional anything
is the coach's work good... are his methods, analysis and plans top quality and calculated to produce positive effect, to bring out the best in players so that on performance they can demand bigger pay checks..is his attitude and general social skills adequate to the task of maintaining a fluent locker room ::confused:: ::confused::
that is all the players must be concerned with relative to coaches. otherwise players are responsible for their own professionalism under the coach leading that team. in those circumstances the ownership will note if the facts relevant to quality coaching are in place with their selection for coach.. and if not make a change.
but such changes ought not have any dam thing to do with whether players like a coach or not on, or the coach is too friendly to players and so they take advantage. all of that exist of course but it is totally unbecoming of professional men who have been to universities even if they did not graduate. they have been exposed to the world, are in the world, exposed to high interactive flows of life, affording them opportunity to learn and grow and rid themselves of childishness.
Labour's childishness at all levels of employment wont do for them and for society as a whole. Labour allows itself to be easily compromised, to remain ignorant of its role and responsibility in the social process, to develop itself fully in relation to its side of the of the basic contradiction that drives social development..the owner/worker paradox. the more labour is compromised the more the chances of society for positive social development, for democratic development are compromised.. the more the chances of the development of human security are done in.
it is past time for the Tampa players to come up in the process of get run out of town
