Morphic Fields

if you tap into the work of Rupert Sheldrake, a leading voice in the area of morphic resonance you may come into a lot that supports my contempt for religion although his work has produced the opposite effect in him..Sheldrake has returned him to the church although I am not sure of his current idea of god

morphic fields are truly interesting...

genes, molecules, electrons protons are responsible for doing work in the human body. they do not explain much beyond their function.  we exists in fields that shape and do much else. what are these fields.....????

again my point is that we will come to understanding of god, of existence by sight and not by faith.  faith is blind and a waste of time..not required at all.  god does not hide..what there is, all there is, there for us to find..prolly right in our faces and we cant see..yet blind are we

I am not sorry to say that faith/church/religion makes me angry for the historically stultifying, blinding, time consuming, wasteful and destructive nonsense that collection of related human practices are.  I make no apology. 

I throw my opinion to the wind and let it spread everywhere, in addition to, and in support of  those who agree with me, and who work to expose religion for what it is now, and as it has been so far..a serious threat to the continuation of human life in the universe..a collection of practices that busts/busted up human life, set up all manner of atrocity and human exploitation of itself..justified/justifies all manner of human evil and wickedness in the world..the incredible mass murder of the world wars in which the gods blessed every side, and their weapons..and now threatens to end us all with a final war that will end indeed all wars

had I the power I would burn every church that exists..but I prefer to burn the priests, the religious administrations... for they know the fraud they perpetrate.  I wud leave the buildings for practical use. 

I would however leave the people free to pursue god in any way they chose without interpreters, leaders, popes and religious princes and princesses. 

I wud make sure to provide the people with all truth, information available, all the documents from ancient times unadulterated. or even better leave them to find them on their own if they wanted to.

there must be no possibility in religious practice of coercion and exploitation, by and through the full development of people, their faculties to think reason and decide on their own, in a reality in which they did not have to grovel for subsistence, and so are beholden to no man, woman or exploitative social system for life..so they are free to deal properly with the truth they find and only that..in the ways they find practical and relative

that is to make of or allow for the development of human beings into full men and women in existence, each a factor of real independence in the full social cooperativeness that would allow for human indefinite survival, each human being indeed a prince and process of the most full human development possible in the most positive social environment we can develop.

that I believe is what god/nature requires of us, to learn from us and through us. 

we are a product of nature in its own ongoing survival.  all its extrusions must be in accordance with that, the survival of nature itself. 

we, are also this way, a natural product and our opportunity in life is in accordance with this way of proceeding.  to stop human development is to be contrary to nature and that is what organized religion has accomplished...

religion has hamstrung humanity for 2000 years now, has kept us back and made life touch and go for the profit of the priests..the economic priests as well.  humanity should be 2 thousands years ahead of where we are but for jackass organized religion. 

we should have long ago resolved the contradictions of productive collective work for our subsistence, evolved into cooperative society and beyond.  we should have long recaptured the garden of our youth, the paradise of myth by our own knowledge and creation...and humanity well on its way to whatever destiny awaits us, or is there for us. 

we developed the road block ourselves ORGANIZED RELIGION and the penalty is to be stuck in the detritus of our practices and jackass beliefs.. the hell on earth we now have. 

just imagine the kiss-mih-ass oxymoron by which we live..in an existence in which eyes are essential for life we MUST LIVE BY FAITH! self imposed blindness and stupidity that, from the start, but hopefully not to our finish.  hopefully we catch ourselves in time

in a morphic field of some sort in your memories which are not stored in the brain. 

when you access your memory it is an instant effect..a transaction at a speed much faster than light...like non-locality  which was first spoken of by Alain Aspect in a 1979 experiment

you see long ago my sense of all this was accurate.  the universe works, is an ongoing process, whole and that its secrets and realities are for all.  you simple have to be born that's all relative to church doctrine. 

church is presumptuous and nonsensical..that we are to access any/every dam thing through what they preach and set up as gods word..and that we are to believe, have faith in what is absolute clap trap presumption.

you can have no idea how angry I am at religion, pissed off and utterly unforgiving of religion..all of them..every last one of them.  we put that shit in place and look at the damage we have done to ourselves.  we must end it..rather reconstitute it in such a way that it leads to truth, that it reforms itself as it goes, corrects itself or eliminates itself if in the living of it properly it is found that there is no use for it

we have to find out how existence works, what it is  and now we see much more and wud have been much further ahead already but for organized religion.

now we can see how the body can die and what we are essentially can remain...in a plausible proven way.  this is one way at least that takes us forward..and the research method is the thing.  we can now look into it, and into all questions in increasingly sophisticated ways

that is what I mean by eyes open, that faith is not necessary.. that if there is a god out there we can find IT by sight and wont do that,cant indeed do so by faith..that faith is blind and nonsensical..and that no god could possibly require its human  creations to live by faith.

that is impossible, true nonsense if I ever heard such thing.

nature so far does not appear to be concerned by whatever the hell humanity does..it learns from all..and that what is useful in the fullness of time may be repeated but not that which is not wont be.  it seems clear that t is up to us to understand this and to bring our behavior into line or we wont make it at all.

and again this adds strength to my conception to be concerned up here with the life, to make it better and to let what comes after take care of itself.  we will deal with that when we get there..and get there we will for it is only to be born that qualifies us to get there not what the churches say about it.

the churches d not know a dam thing about it and do not want to.. for such knowledge makes their existence moot..and they cant afford that.  they must keep the flocks blind and ignorant so they can stay in place.
a pox on them

nature  learns from and through us..by the method we also lock into nature how we are..how we have developed.  so nature memorises all our human patterns..individual and collective.  so over the spectrum of human natures behavior behaviors nature has them all in memory and can repeat, buttress, fortify.

but nature does not have a morality that compares to what we have developed. if nature learns nature does not know.  at what rate does nature learn, does nature come to conclude on what it learns, or does its extrusions, limited by its from free within to develop as they can.limited only by natural conditions.

or as part of life evolved by nature nature concerns like going on is impressed on its extrusions as obsessive reproduction....

then again if nature is alive as it surely is and so concerned about things about its extrusions we can see are urgent why..are all crucial to natures own existence...does nature have insecurities too..is nature forever to, faces its own extinction and by its extrusions seek to perpetuate itself?

is nature yet a child or a form of process that is not mature hence our nature and wildness, our construction that is formless, purposeless unless we in turn see nature as we can see ourselves as individual, ignorant and insecure.  why must we be so different from nature...why are not indeed born in the image and likes not of the god of our creation but of nature and that nature is like us and all the forms that exist?

we prey on each other for survival..that too is nature and we must weaponise something to survive..or try to.  there is not a form in existence in the general hostility of existence that has not developed defenses and forms of attack..to fend off that which sees it as prey and to attack which it sees as prey.

nature evolved this general hostility among its extrusions. if an intelligence is behind life why would there be such hostility unless it is an intentional puzzle..but a serious one for those who have been eaten alive up to now

when Paul had his revelation..that we would not entirely sleep..what did he discover actually...was it what Shelldrake talks about now?

I do not see anything in and about human behavior that is created.  impossible.  I cannot fathom an intelligence within the scope of human intellectual activity, developed on the life we have lived, our collective experience, relative as it is, that can possibly have been created.

within what Shelldrake reveals there is 'evidence for such beliefs as reincarnation, telepathy and so on..and he tell us what they may be according to his science.  good stuff but he is still now letting on all he knows.

however I have not accounted for all human behavior and I do't know all human behaviors, cultures etc.  I do know for example the current contrast between the collective behavior of the western elites as truly hostile and stamped with human extinction... and that of the eastern perspective that seeks the opposite of western goals in the world. and we know western based on centuries old western practice that what they want is conquest and plunder

but the east was not always that way, was indeed as hostile as the west has always been..and we do not know the extent of eastern sincerity..only that disciplined by the intent of the west to re-conquer and plunder them, they must unite and provide a positive alternative to western depredation... that it is indeed most productive and mutually protective, for the east to move as it is now doing in the world.

the east collectively is waiting out western decline, deepening such decline to a point at which the west will no longer be able to afford its dominance.  will the west blow up  planet earth before that happens, unable to deal with its loss of global dominance?

so how does our morphic fields affect and influence western and eastern perspectives in their fullness?

what are those fields really responsible for..how do they come into being,  by Shelldrake they are responsible for physical formation the creation of forms. by this then can we say they are creative?

and if they are creative why does he talk of a 'kind of memory' in nature and not a creative principle in morphic fields to which he ascribes the capability of producer of forms...

there is much confusion produced by Sheldrake.  we can be certain only in that there is much more to the life than we have been told, that in our own life's experience we have seen and felt things of the nature of what Shelldrake discusses and for certain there is much more to it than we know..and very likely to what such as Shelldrake have discovered in his researches..as well as in the capture from such work what the various powerful governments in the world have from their own scientists