so who is steve Jones and Beecham ::confused::
what makes them more credible than my sources...... ::confused::
and who say I use sources... ::confused::
I post links and comment on them...review them from my own base of knowledge and experience. go back and see almost every link..my own review...REVIEW of the link itself..especially when it corroborates and repeats what I have been saying all along..conclusions I have made over long gestation
't know what the hell you are talking about..you and googs.. is wood and steel in alyuh rarse. all allyuh do is to attack what I post up with stupid comments and disparagement...never reasoned argument.
then you post up your supports... econmists like Joseph Nye, a rightwing capitalist apologist.
who takes Nye seriously. No one that's who.
now you post up this piece of crap here about inbreeding! what is the purpose of that sh!t..where is it supposed to take us..somewhere idiotic I guess eh.
look here man. just take your family and count 27 generations back to the year 1200 AD and note a serious population problem.
now I use a 30 year period for the generations. but if you go back you will get lower life expectancy and shorter generations which compounds the population problem you will get..the more generations the more people you end up with anyway
you see sketchim..if you go back in time from current population levels and give everyone alive normal regular parents..that is one mother and father, 4 grandparents etc... you end up in the past with upwards of 50 billion people alive in the year 1200 AD..... or any dam year you care to select...the further back you go the more people you end up with..a hundred billion people alive at the time of the building of the pyramids
don't you see man..INCEST must have been a natural and accepted factor in human life all along...for long periods of time so that the same people were father, grandfather etc at one and the same time.
no matter how you cut it that is the case. you can factor in extinction events, population bottle necks etc., etc., it works out the same way: INBREEDING IS HUGE FACTOR IN HUMAN EVOLUTION... AND IT IS NOT A BIOLOGICAL PROBLEM NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT IT IN CHRISTIAN SOCIETY
and that is what science is saying today..that inbreeding is not a biological problem and the previous science was just a step on the way and did not, could not provide comprehensive and final answers to all biological questions
and do you know that incest is completely legal in many countries in the world..that only marriage is so far prohibited in most countries of the world..and that only in the english speaking world and Germany is the law still rabid relative to incest and inbreeding.
and do you know that in Canada you can marry your niece and an aunt can marry her nephew subject to some kind of test
and look at this
metro.co.uk/2015/03/07/a-gay-man-had-a-s...-his-mother-5092770/
now would you need a blog for you to reason that out yourself. all of that is simple facts before your eyes. there are many human customs that cannot be understood save life was exactly the way I have described it. human customs can be explanatory fossils too..not only old bones and blood markers
so you want me to stop posting. not a problem. there is nutten for me here at all. there is nutten to learn from you. what you offer I don't need..passed that crap long time now
unless Jones and Beecham speak with what I have said in mind I aint interested. the truth is the truth.. not all the western crap that drives your consciousness..you and gooley skunt..googley, a priest! exactly why I dont go to church