you have no idea the scope of what I mean..what I am saying...or conversely the extent of all of this at this time and state of knowledge.
my advice to you is to read, look and listen... and open mind.
also you do not know what african american feel or want on any issue..what they want collectively. I never claimed to. I merely established what I want. to happen..what I would do had I the power to do so
look at some critique of DNA sequencing:
yes but that white lawyer is also very very partial and misdirecting..not to mention silly. all he has to do is at the point backward where each one of us would have had a million ancestors add them all up and see the demographic level at all points on the way..and he would find massive populations levels in the past that simply did not exists. in fact there would be more people, greater populations from a certain point in the past that would surpass the 7-8 billion alive today!
but you cant have more people in the past than we do currently. but by that kind of extrapolation we do. so what exactly went on them if by backward extrapolation we will never find the real quantity of ancestors we are supposed to have.
how in the hell are we here if we did not have the amount of natural ancestors we are supposed to have had ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
a simple approach is that human incest was widespread, a normal condition and activity of human culture. without incest we would not have made it at all, around the demographic bottlenecks that humanity faced early and a long way towards today.
if one goes back 10 generations of 30 years that is 230 years and 1024 people. by incest one would have to cut down that 1024 by a significant %. and the further back goes the more severe the cuts must be, guided by the actual population rates we know existed.
and if incest then the DNA should be much simpler to understand. we have a much smaller global population or number of people to deal with all the way to currently, than is the impression.
and no science is apparently screening for incest in the DNA! or the impact of general incest on DNA. science appears to be approaching DNA like our lawyer approaches his DNA hypothesis..through religious eyes, blinded by current reality and the nuclear family... as if indeed we have had the nuclear family in human culture from day one
there is a lot of info that we have proved but all the approaches to analysis is skewered..by class, religious, elitist, racist and exceptional perspectives, conscious/unconscious biased orientations. and some like my lawyer are just plain stupid
that is what I see and what I have tried to prove using that last vid as evidence