-
The Captain
-
Topic Author
-
Visitor
-
05 Apr 2016 13:23 #300083
by The Captain
“Panama Papers†leak may have possible implications for Guyana
Apparently, the leaked records show that Gunnlaugsson co-owned a company set up in 2007 on the Caribbean island of Tortola, in the British Virgin Islands, to hold investments with his wealthy partner whom he later married.
There are possible ramifications for Caribbean countries as well. The Panama Papers reported that the law firm has over 3000 clients in the US and 9000 in the United Kingdom, in addition to other countries. The paper showed a map which highlighted the different clientele countries, with Guyana being significantly highlighted, along with Venezuela, Brazil and other South American countries.
It is too early, however, to tell if any of the information that was leaked has relevance to Guyana since out of the 11.5 million documents only 154 are in the public domain.
http://i0.wp.com/www.guyana-times.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/leaked-map.jpg?zoom=2&resize=300%2C131
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Nargis
-
-
Visitor
-
05 Apr 2016 16:11 #300119
by Nargis
i dont know whats so wrong about an off shore account
i should be able to bank where ever i want
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Kwami
-
-
Visitor
-
05 Apr 2016 16:45 #300124
by Kwami
The selective leaks from the so called Panama papers had but one intention and that was to embarrass Vladamir Putin . It is not a co incidence that his photo was featured prominently on the news release but nowhere did they connect him to offshore accounts
They are trying to influence the upcoming Russia elections but it is not working. \ Is it a coincidence that Americans are not featured here?. No corruption there?
The chinese Govt newspaper , "South China morning dispatch'' said the same and no Chinese publication are allowed to publish these Panama papers because of the anti Putin slant
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 93768
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 93768
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
05 Apr 2016 17:04 #300129
by ketchim
Offshore companies aren't illegal—not inherently, anyway. But using them to hide assets from
tax authorities, thwart investigations, and protect criminals is.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Kwami
-
-
Visitor
-
05 Apr 2016 17:11 #300130
by Kwami
[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)] [/color]The timing of the leaks is perfect: Western leaders cannot afford to applaud the Russian-Syrian victory in Palmyra, so they decided to put a spoon of tar in a barrel of honey, as the Russian proverb says.
[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)] It’s clear that the Panama Leaks are part of the West’s hybrid war against Russia.
[/color]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Kwami
-
-
Visitor
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 93768
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
-
Nargis
-
-
Visitor
-
06 Apr 2016 12:08 #300191
by Nargis
so if i hide my money under my mattress is a problem for who?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
“Panama Papers†have possible implications for Guyana
Time to create page: 0.196 seconds