Less
More
-
Posts: 62472
-
Thank you received: 36
-
-
29 Apr 2016 14:25 #302777
by chairman
Just as increasing taxation on tobacco products is aimed at reducing smoking among a population in order to promote healthier lifestyles, so too will be the result by increasing taxes on soda.
Since soda and other sugary beverages are a major contributor to poor diets across the world, former Health Minister Dr Leslie Ramsammy is urging all governments to implement a ‘soda tax’ to encourage healthier diets among its citizenry.
Just as the tobacco industry did with cigarettes, soda companies go to great lengths to target vulnerable populations. Research show that a great amount of soda advertising is aimed at children and teenagers as well as low-income communities.
Soda is one of the most consumed beverages in the United States, second only to water.
Soda’s connection to the obesity epidemic is so intertwined, Harvard researchers have calculated each additional soda consumed increases the risk of obesity 1.6 times.
Incessant soda consumption eventually leads to increased risk of diabetes, osteoporosis, reproductive issues, heart diseases, kidney issues, among other negative health dangers.
Dr Ramsammy, in a statement, pointed out that poor diets today is a bigger problem than hunger.
He said while less than 800 million people go hungry every day, more than 2 billion people consume diets that are making them sick.
Dr Ramsammy noted that for years he has been talking about the need to implement heavy taxation on soda but despite his sound rationale, very few paid attention to the call.
Charging heavy taxes on soda will pressure distributors to pass the cost along to businesses and consumers. Should they increase the price of their products – and this is the straightforward effect – the additional cost could reduce soda consumption by encouraging people to select healthier, cheaper options.
Additionally, a taxed industry will act as an “anti-soda†public health campaign since people tend to understand that product-specific taxes are only levied when a substance can cause harm.
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Googley
-
-
Visitor
-
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
29 Apr 2016 16:30 - 01 May 2016 07:40 #302797
by mapoui
all ah dat is jess profiteering. if something is not healthy, making people sick, ban it doh tax it. get rid of it.
is like paying 5 cents fuh ah plastic bag to stop it from polluting the garbage dump. it not biodegradable.
but all five cents does is enrich the pockets of those who make bags and the tax man. it doh stop the bag from getting to the dump. and deh know dat.
ban the bag if it dangerous. ban the pop if it dangerous. dat is the simple and only ansah
Last edit: 01 May 2016 07:40 by mapoui.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Lavos
-
-
Visitor
-
30 Apr 2016 14:50 #302856
by Lavos
The problem is sugar bomb drinks, cigar and alcohol are quite addictive. So you will only get people blowing out their money in consuming these stuffs. It's sad, but people only change willingly their habits when they are already suffering the side effects of abusing soda, cigarettes or alcohol.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
Ramsammy urges ‘soda tax’ implementation – to promote healthier lifestyle
Time to create page: 0.174 seconds