Are There ARE parallel universes: Physicists state multiverses are INTERACTING

Are There ARE parallel universes: Physicists state multiverses are INTERACTING

PARALLEL universes DO exist and they influence each other, according to a revolutionary theory from a group of physicists.

By SEAN MARTIN
UPDATED: 17:48, Sat, Nov 26, 2016


There could be many universes
Academics are challenging the status quo of the single universe theory by claiming many different universes coexist and they all affect each other.

Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr Michael Hall from Griffith University's Centre for Quantum Dynamics, and Dr Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of California claim parallel universes are a reality and influence one another through quantum mechanics.

The experts claim quantum theory is a necessity to explain the multiverse ideas, but recognise the late Richard Feynman’s quote, who once said "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics”.

As such, they have taken a different approach in an attempt to elaborate on their theory.


Our universe could be one of many
The team have developed the ‘Many Interacting Worlds’ theory which provides a new prospective.

Professor Wiseman said: "The idea of parallel universes in quantum mechanics has been around since 1957.

"In the well-known ‘Many-Worlds Interpretation’, each universe branches into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made.


Each universe could be very similar or vary massively
“All possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised by the Portuguese.

"But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do not influence our universe at all. On this score, our ‘Many Interacting Worlds’ approach is completely different, as its name implies."

Our universe might not be the only one

The team’s new theory proposes our universe is just one of many gigantic worlds – some of which are almost identical to ours while others are completely different.

They add all of the worlds are equally real and exist on the same timeline, and all of them interact through a universal force of repulsion – essentially bumping in to each other.

Dr Hall says their approach could help researchers test the theory of multiverses.


He said: "The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world our theory reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of worlds it reproduces quantum mechanics.

"In between it predicts something new that is neither Newton's theory nor quantum theory.

"We also believe that, in providing a new mental picture of quantum effects, it will be useful in planning experiments to test and exploit quantum phenomena."

Any new theories fellow posters?

Quantum mechanics seem to me like fairy tales .
  There is no universe .. uni means one . Ain no multiverse .. Multi means many
My theory .. There is a bi verse .. bi means two .  The world functions  on equal and opposite '
If there is good , then there must be evil .  Up then down .. ying .. yang .. matter .. anti matter . north  pole .. south pole .. penis .. vagina.. If there is a cock then there has to be a hen and you  cant have two bulls in one pen.
Therefore Alien discount all the above theories and go with mine .. biverse

The EU.. Electric Universe..says there is not a shred of evidence for multiverses, so how can something be posed when it is totally imaginative ::confused::

life, existence is a process isnt it..so can there be good and bad about it ::confused::

good and bad must be relative and subjective.  like what may be bad for humanity may be good for another species.  so while human life may go over in turmoil, even extinction... what happens as a result ::confused::

existence goes on and in whatever conditions that come about something will be here/there..cause and effect.

the total universal process has had an origin of its own..about which we do not yet have a clue.  the Electric Universe establishes that we do not know anything yet..or  that our collective scientific knowledge.. does not yet permit us to speak of origins. we just do not know how it all began..if there there was a start to it indeed

the big bang has been proven to be nonsense and so are the gods and the doctrines of all organized religions.

the universal process is working, has always been working, evolving, changing, cause and effect.  that which was established becomes destabilized by the nature of movement, matter in motion, energized and electrical..clearing the way for new and more in tune with natural change. 

the forms that get the worse of it by their inability to adapt, are unlucky and no longer fit for survival.  they may consider what has happened to them evil but that is the way nature is. of course what was happening to them, in their day, was good

but it was 'your day', relatively, and now it is done. the day has passed into the day of something else.

if as a form you have the means to think and act in ways that may result in understand how nature works, you may come to  capture 'the day' permanently.. there you go.  that is your task in life..to survive indefinitely if you can.

but if you cant your day will surely come to an end, by the evolution of natural processes of nature.  and in the process all will be subjective and arbitrary and relative.  if its good for you it is 'good'  if its not good for you, you call it is 'evil'

and of course that comes down to human behavior.  subjectivity comes down to human social differences..delineated by class interests.  elite classes for example, their subjectivity is limited by class perspective and to win accordingly. to maintain and develop such a sectarian subjectivity requires harsh behavior to the rest of humanity not of that/their class.

such, results in the brutal exploitation and mass murder of endless amounts of societies and people of the human species. 

that is part of what we call 'evil' behavior but is it evil in an ideal sense..that there is evil as a separate thing, that we have a choice of doing or not doing..evil a state that exists outside of humanity residing in a devil for eg, it's icon, ideal..and its opposite god,where good as ideal resides ::confused::

I see no such organization of life.  I see humans naturally as brutal and violent, insecure and subjective and that is the way we were/are born, produced and formed that way by existential natural conditions of life.  all we are flows from our natural evolution in the conditions that gave rise to us.  we can be no different..or could have been no different up to now.

we can now be different because we can end human insecurity and tame human subjectivity by the advancing knowledge of our conditions of existence which explains our insecurity/subjectivity clearly...knowledge which also explains better as we go, our  real history, where we came from, how we got to this point, all we have been through.  we can now end all human material problems and emotional problems to high and on-going levels by our advanced technology, science.

what that does for us is to expose human collective emotional trauma by knowing and understanding our collective experience and the effect it has had on us from as early back we can prove... as we go.

that allows us to put ourselves on the couch, to assess our psychology and solve our collective emotional problems with truth and understanding.  but which interestingly can only be accomplished by revolutionary social change. 

an elite in charge, a minority concerned only about their social control cannot conceive of and implement general social change for all the people.  they got where they are by war, conquest, theft and general social exploitation.  any social change that makes the generality of humanity knowledgeable, physically fit, mentally sound challenges elitist minority social control and they cannot afford that if they are to remain on top the human heap..which is their only concern.

and we see how serious that concern is to them for the kill humanity all over the planet as if they are so much bad water to be filtered out completely.

we have come to this point humanity by social class division, war and conquest which is evil for the majority of humanity but good for the minority who profit from such activity.  the material and intellectual development of humanity now makes it possible for there to be social change to remove the minority control bring in a saving revolutionary change that places the people in charge of society. it is a change that would make what we now call evil  redundant..and establish what we call good as the way of life

:-[ :-[ :-[ :-[