Misformation and Dumbing Down! SCA and His Tactics!

1} come up wit a response Friday:  Prove that bill gates kill blac people! 
poor compostion of a response because nowhere in what had gone on before had gates been accused of killing blac people.  the inplication is that was to come.  so the response was a calculated misdirection, chaing the flow and puttne a burnden on the one who started the post

2} the basis of gates stated attempts to help africa is by vaccinations.

science has caught up with vaccinations..they are a harm and not a help to human health.  so the question begs:  if a donor is prepared to spend 10 billion dollars for vaccinations...it would make sense for him to take 5k of that and get a proper, current, scientific opinion on the efficacy of vaccinies. and on discovering that they are no longer of health value, the 10 billion can be re-directed and refocused where it can be of real use..indigenous economic development on the africam continent.

}  I began that previous post and listed several links that explained the problem with vaccines and the currnet unfavourable impression of vaccines, bill gates and the class he represents relevant to human population and openly and stated intent by that class to reducen the human population of planet earth by 90%.

one assumes that by reading those links the poster in question would have altered his approach at least by posting evidence of his contrary case... the comparsion of which could have led to broader debate on the issue and possibly a reasonable conclusion that would have taken us forward.

that is the reason for debate not so?

4}  but lo and behold this morning what do we get:  a return to Fridays starting gate:  PROVE BILL GATES KILL BLACK PEOPLE...START A CLASS ACTION..WHY LIVE IN A CAPITALIST COUNTRY?

5} interesting!  is the poster stupid?  did nothing happen in the interim? 

he is not stupid and lots happend in the interim..so why steady adherence to a low, wrong point in the debate, that actually stiffles and led backwards, to personal abuse and insult

} so what is our poster up to..why does he insist not on engaging in talk about the issue itself...presenting evidence to support his opinion, offering a light opinion of his own on the issue..but on the negative with no comment..just the gates notion.  he does not budge from that.

I am yet to see this poster present an opinion..comprehensive opinion on any current issue and back it up with evidence, toss it our and let it stand or fall in review, arguing his case as he goes and changing if the weight of evidence suggets that he should,..or 'wins' and forces such change in his detractors...

isnt that the way of inteligence..open to everyhing that is plausible, accepting that which proves out?