October 1st 2012 : Arrives

I am not sure what Hunte has done that you describe him as "small minded".

Hilaire is not "small minded", he is just an unsavoury individual.

Sammy has done nothing that is "small minded".

Sammy accept a Job he is NOT capable of performing , knowingly.

Hunte has be in the administration of Cricket over 25 years

Hillaire believe that Stars are not needed in a Team...

Watcha call those......  BIG minded ? 

Every single day in this world folks accept jobs they are not capable of performing.

Obviously Sammy felt that he had something to contribute so why knock him.

Chetty was head of Guyana cricket for many many many years yet I never heard any complaints from Guyanese. And this same Chetty was angling to be head of WICB even though there were serious conflicts of interest.

When Guyana went to the CL tournament in South Africa it was pathetic to see how Chetty and his cohorts hung their mouth where the soup was dropping. I am sure the Guyana board was the one who paid for their tickets and hotel accomodation.

Hilaire is just a nasty individual - they have plenty of those in this world.

How Chetty and Guyana get into dis ?

Sammy is not currently in charge of any Guyanese .

Julian Hunte just reject the Wilkins report re : structure of WICB.

We agree on Hilarious ...

Because Chetty and Guyana are part of the West Indies Cricket Board.

Hunte rejected a report and that means what? Every day in the western world consultants and committees prepare reports - some findings get accepted and some get rejected. Nothing new here.

It is quite possible that the entire structure of West Indies cricket needs to be revamped. Let us see if Hunte's successor seizes the opportunity to do so. All dem years before Hunte took charge I did not hear any clarion calls for restructuring.

By his own Governance Committe and Board member .

No consultants involve  ::redface::

hahahahaha...oh . maaaan !

Imagine the dude reject he own Report ............ ::rofl::

hence, my small mind reference 

I stand corrected. You did say Wilkins report and I assumed quite wrongly that you were referring to the Patterson report.

I will have to check on this Wilkins report and get back to you.

I can assure you he rejected it  :: ::

all 17 points !

I don't dispute your assertion, I just have no idea what the report advocated.