as I was saying on my other thread, 'there is an elephant in the room that no one is talking about'
there is an extraordinary comparative here with historical contiguity of the same quality, namely the sequence that flowed from 1936-38 when Winston Churchill was again introduced into english politics and made prime minister after he had been obscure since the first world war as a blundering idiot of a war secretary.
Churchill carried on the way regardless, no matter what, even though Hitler begged him not to got to war, that he had nutten against Britain, wanted Britain to continue as as an empire as it was an steady organizing force in the world which is what the Germans wanted.
Churchill caused the second european war..pursued it relentlessly, single minded, tunnel vision. but why ::confused::
the top historians and commentators on the second european war the respect ones call that war the unnecessary war for all those reasons and more.
the during that war Churchill pursued the most atrocious policies against the Germans, was responsible for the total destruction of German cities unrelated to the war most significantly Dresden. 100 million plus people were killed in that war..untold destruction all because of Churchill.
you see it is extreme, limitless, on-going, unending and chaotic, heartless, conscience less violence that drenches the world in blood, stuns the soul.
we saw it in the second european war, in Viet Nam and East Timor, in Chile and Indonesia...and now in this world spanning terrorist situation conceived of and developed in the bowels of Washington, seeded and implemented in the middle east, exploding there and spreading outward into the whole world
who the hell is so capable, purposed, with such intent, as to create all that ::confused::
it is the elephant in the room that no one talks about. everyone behaves as if the elephant is not there::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
but the elephant is always there directing the show
Churchill was capable of such violence..to conceive of it himself. he could follow such orders if he was beholden to the order givers and he was beholden to the order givers for that is how. but how he got the power to do as he did...the power and the orders ::confused::
Churchill was a bum of an english aristocrat, a racist psychopath capable of anything at all. ANYTHING!!
Churchill was broke and could not pay his bills for his beloved estate..Checkers. so he was bought out by certain people with money, and shepherded all the way into the Prime ministers chair.
Churchill was anything but an independent party in the mix. Churchill was totally beholden to those who had saved his estate from bankruptcy, put him into the black and kept him there, led him to 10 Downing street. those are who called the shots for Churchill, told him what to do.
these monied people key directed Churchill to start the war with Germany and to keep it going at all costs. the drunken sociopath Churchill was well up to that task, was in sync with all the evil intentions of his mentors..which is why they resurrected his political career and bought him the Prime Minister's office
(for references to my comments here, see the relevant works of David Irving and Pat Buchanan..among others)