Grandmas Grow Gold in Swaziland

Dude good luck...You rass mad fio real. Check and see the good that Gates does and then ask yourself what are you doing to help the africans.

Or is it that teh evil white man will always exploit hte innocent black man. Check and see what gates have to gain. He doesn't need money, he doesn't need anything....the man has money to buy whatever he needs....his children will not be the sole benefactors of his wealth. The man is a philantrophist...but black people like you wont understand that. They see evil all the time in the white man. You are a racist maps. 

yu cant ansah the question?

cast all yuh stones, pelt all yuh have..but yuh cyar anash the question.  YU DONT KNOW! 

ansah the one above about vaccines then?

yuh ever hear about a fella called Richard Leakey?  yes!  from the famous Leaky antropologist family who do all that reseach in africa.

yes!  well Richard wrote a book some years back call ORIGINS RE-VISITED!  get that book man and go to the last chapter on population and you will see what his discussion is.

Gates talks about too many people.  Leakey establishes that once all humanity is developed we will start to have population problems.  but get this:  FROM HOW TO MAINTAIN POPULATION LEVELS AND GO ON...NOT TOO MANY PEOPLE

thats right!  look at the developed countries currently... from reasons of pollution etc.,  MEN ARE LOSING SPERM COUNT AND WOMEN FERTILITY. 

BUT DEVELOPED PEOPLE CAN ALSO RESTRICT THEIR REPRODUCTION... AND ALL COMBINED HAVE ALREADY REDUCED REPRODUCTION IN THE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES TO BELOW REPLACEMENT LEVELS!

YET WHAT IS BILL AND MELINDA SPEAKING ABOUT? 

yes you guessed it...REDUCTION?

but why...are they insane!?

are they crazy to be seeking reduction when the problem already is a dangerous reduction in some parts of the world?

that is why yu must ansah the question on technology, on economy...the single most distinguising current feature of which is monopoly.  there is the ansah to one question fuh you: MONOPOLY!

what does it mean SCA..monopoly in the face the highest levels of technology ever achieved by humanity?

go on....  I am waiting? :: ::

PROVE IT!  PROVE THAT WHAT HE HAS DONE IS ACTUALLY GOOD! :: ::

DO YU KNOW WHAT ALL THIS HERE PROVES ABOUT YOU  SCA?

IT PROVES THAT YOU ARE A TOTAL, COMPREHENSSIVE, COMPLETE IGNORAMUS..A FOOL, A MAN WHO KNOWS VERY LITTLE REAl PROVEN FACTS ABOUT THE WORLD... KNOWS OR ASSUMES A LOT OF NONSENSE AND HOLDS FORTH STRONGLY ON ALL HIS NONSENSE ASSUMPTIONS

that is what that quote proves

how de behine i get into this ..

Cause is he Topic thread :

and " too much of one ting ....sumting....sumting  :: ::

the man has no quotes or links to anyone and anything to buttress his argument....

all post long he has added no support for his claims.  he has been totally subjective, expressing only his assumptions on the issues at hand.

and pelting assrtions and disrespect and personal attack.

and he clearly wants people to take him seriously   how is any such thing even remotely possible! :lipsrsealed:

Maps...trust me I don't want you to take me seriously...you and I beg to differ...you are paranoid, and perhaps a bit off the rockers.

I am sorry I attempted to get into a reasonable exchange. My bad.

bos wat rockers yu talking about? 

just because yu dont know does not mean I am off my rockers.  there is a whole body pof work accepted by great intelelctual secions of the world called marxism that postulated long time agaon that given the nature of capitaliosm it would arrive at monopoly at in the face of high technology which would make the working class redundant

long ago SCA.  what i have been asking you is not new or news.  it is old but yu dont know..dont have a clue.  but go find out then.  all the marxist classics are there for you to read and teach yourself.

dont you realise that even if trillions of dollars are spent in a capitlaist stumulation of the economy it wont produce much employment for the principles of investment in captilaist economy makes no sens unless you build the latest technologies into prodcution.  that means little employment in the facrtors all of which will be automated.

add that to the way the economy functiuons organised by banking that funnells all the monty to the top in quick order and you see the paradox. 

in previous times they would write of the debt and society would start back.  but there is no opportunity to do that now.  start back where and how?  to write off the debt take away the wealth of the rich and they can never come back for the only way to get sopeiceyt employed again is to rebuild infrastruture and place the productive secotrs in the hand s of the people.  so they can apply the technology and shar out the world and the profits.  the wealth will still be created by machines byt opwned by the people all will be paid and the economy can go on but with no capitalism.

for the capitalist to go on they have to do something about the people of the whorld who are now redundant in captialism... but not in democracy or socialism.

for the capitalist class to go on they have to get rid of the people you fool. 

and that is exactly what they have decided to do,  hence the murderous wars, the enginering of food, the bad medicine, the oganiszing of health delivery systems to harm and not heal. 

s*** they are even stopping people from growing home gardens forcing them to buy the poisoned food in the supermarkets.


I am off my rockers!  we look at a world in which america droped not 1 but 2 atomic weapons incinerating half a million people instantly! 

we have Iraq where women are aborting pregnancies and refusing to have childrne due to the grotesqueries they are delivering.  american has dropped the equivalent of many nuclear bombs in the DU werpons they have used Iraq, alterring the Iraqui DNA

the same thing is happening everywher american weapons are being used.

look at how they have just killed gaddafi..look at how Hillary Clinton celebrated...man look at the nuts world and yu call me nuts, off my rocker?  what the hell... you who so stupid you cant even speak... far less act in your own best interest 

look at Rwanda!  Bill Clinton in cahoots with the French were the ones responsible for that Genocide. they sat, planed it and set it in motion.. using their african stooge Paul kagame to kerry it out.  a million peopel dead..just like that.

and yu say I am off my riockers.  I never did anything like that in my life..never contemplated such as that.

what i suspect SCA is that behind my back, behind the scenes you are into my life, hearing things and formulatingf opinions about me, that are just like all you other assumptions here.

yu dont know me.  let me suggest that you do not conclude at all until you actually know who mapoui is

If you are such a marxist....then why are you in the west???


If you were to believe that it is you, maps, posting such drivel, that is one thing, but to ask another person to believe your nonsense is asking too much. Your 'theories' are not substantiated with facts, are devoid of reasoning, and cannot withstand any empherical test...so why should i bother with your nonsense? Your read outlandish, fringe publication and give it credence because it fancies you, then fine. Carry on.