-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 13:56 #131888
by mapoui
well there appear to be a lot of reasons its better to get him to Guantanamo..where military not civil rules apply
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Snoopster
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:02 #131892
by Snoopster
It boggles my mind why SCA can't answer such a simple question Maps.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Snoopster
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:11 #131899
by Snoopster
If SCA was in the witness box I would ask him 3 times to answer the question. If he refused on the 4th I would immediately request a contempt of court order and for him to spend the night in jail.
No one runs from Counsel Snoopy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:12 #131901
by mapoui
because SCA is one of dem fellas who work for those who send them to sites to advocate certain destabilising angles that favour the state.
he is getting paid for what appears to be his political obduracy in debate..but is really calculated bulllshiit to answer your question would be to engage in common sense and intelligent inter-action.
he is not here to promote that
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
SCA
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:15 #131904
by SCA
The only problem it appears is that Snoopy is running from himself....
Counsel careful...don't play loose with facts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Snoopster
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:19 #131907
by Snoopster
Why are you running from answering a simple question?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
SCA
-
-
Visitor
-
-
Snoopster
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:27 #131915
by Snoopster
But would you not agree that in the American system of Jurisprudence, where a person is presumed innocent until guilt is proven in a court of law, an accused person at the start (and even at the conclusion) of a criminal trial has an equal chance of a not guilty verdict as that of a guilty verdict?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
SCA
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:30 #131920
by SCA
My agreement or disagreeemnt is inconsequential. Every person is presumed innocent in a court of law. And the outcome of guilt or innocence is based upon a preponderance of evidence submitted and accepted by the courts as facts.
Now where we we?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Snoopster
-
-
Visitor
-
23 Apr 2013 14:34 #131923
by Snoopster
Proponderance of evidence is the civil standard of proof my dear Watson. The criminal standard of proof in American jurisprudence is beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now why can't you answer a simple question I put before you?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
The right to remain alive
Time to create page: 0.198 seconds