White Farmers Banned From Owning Land In Zimbabwe

AH YO!  I COMMITTED NO HISTORICAL CRIME AGAINST THE ORIGINAL PEOPLE OF THE WEST INDIES!  THAT I AM IN THE WEST INDIES AT ALL IS A CRIME AGAINST ME. 

I WOULD GLADLY, HAPPILY, WILLINGLY, GIVE BACK THE WEST INDIES TO ITS ORIGINAL INHABITANTS AND SAIL TO AFRICA, IF ALL OF THAT CAN BE ARRANGED.  I WOULD LEAVE ALL MY POSSESSIONS TO THE BUCK MAN, AND ANY MONEY I COULD SPARE TO HELP HIM TO RE-ORGANIZE HIMSELF

quid pro quo is that all the interlopers leave africa..get to fuc' out and stay out! >

"'IF'  is not precedent.  you cant work with IF in a court of law I dont think" - Mapoui

yes I can... for all I have said is full of precedent. 

there is nothing illogical in all I have posed, like 8 billion people..the planets population with grudges against each other, suddenly all wanting legal resolution for their grievances at one specific moment in time..NOW. 

that is your IF..abstract really

my if is not anstract, without precedent,  but practical and in sync with routine reality

So "if" is a precedent if it is logical?  Any other departures and variations on this legal principle we should know about? ::LOL::

but in all I have said above IF is not really a factor.  it is you who imposing IF on it and asking me to discuss.  why?

where is there IF in this:

they did take the land back

YOU did look at the popular to take the land back and singled out a group you called 'thugs'.

how in the hell can you look at a popular movement and do that?  that's impossible to do!

totally true..based on history we all know and can easily verify!

again historically true and reasonable position. the white 'farmers' were compounding a historical crime and committing more on top of that

man what if you talking about! ::confused:: ::confused::