What a nihilistic and nonsensical thing to say. War is not a "universal force" nor does it have a "impetus of its own". War does not create itself. It is conjured up by men for specific means, usually involving the capture of land and resouces.
In the case of the Afghanistan, the US could not legally invade so they created a proxy army; the Taliban. This is what big countries do. Repeatedly. And so the US invented the Taliban, they provided leadership advice, tactical advice, training, money, weapons, told them what to do, how to think, where to strike, told them they would be given full political control of the nation, flew in soldiers from Europe, Asia and Africa to join them and, in the space of a decade, turned something which did not exist into something which did.
Go watch action cinema in the 1980s. The Taliban were consistently celebrated. You had guys like Sylvester Stallone, James Bond, Churck Norris and stuff worshiping them and fighting alongside them. Go read about Bosnia and Yugoslavia and how similar fake "religious conflicts" were stirred up to Balkanise (ie split up) Yugoslavia. In those cases, the West sided with muslims against "Christian terrorists" who were mostly imaginary.
___
Here's an interview by Zbigniew Brzezinski, an evil dude and the infamous US strategist who helped create the Taliban. In this interview, he's asked if he regrets forming the group:
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea! The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war!
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic insurgents, having given arms and advice?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
___
These guys don't care about muslims or terrorists. They've got zillion dollar armies at their disposals. A couple thousand muslims with outdated weapons are just pawns to them. And they get away with using these pawns because of the kind of wishy washy emotionalism you see written on threads like this. ("War is its own impetus?" "Muslims want to take over the world!"? what the hell?)
Ironically, nobody cares when the CIA created Christian/Catholic-right terrorist groups like in Latin America or with the Guatemalan genocide. Nah, it's muslims you're scared of. Cos they got beards, beady eyes and living on our oil!
Even more hypocritical is the fact that most of the Taliban's money is coming from the Western nations that supposedly hate them.
Here's investigative journalist Jean MacKenzie:
"The manager of Afghan firms with lucrative construction contracts with the U.S. government builds in a minimum of 20 percent for the Taliban in his cost estimates. The manage states that he makes in the neighborhood of $1 million per month. Out of this, $200,000 is siphoned off for the insurgents. The degree of cooperation and coordination between the Taliban and US aid workers is surprising, and would most likely make funders extremely uncomfortable."
Here's Dr Stuart Bramhall, touching upon other billion dollar business deals made with the Taliban:
"It’s extremely ironic for the US State Department to be issuing travel alerts for US citizens in the Middle East and North Africa the same week we learn that the Pentagon is contracting with Al Qaeda and the Taliban to carry out Afghan reconstruction projects.
Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News cites a quarterly report to Congress by Special Inspector for Afghan Reconstruction John Sopko.The report reveals Sopko asked the US Army Suspension and Disbarment office to cancel 43 contracts to known Al Qaeda and Taliban supporters. They refused. The reason? The Suspension and Disbarment Office claims it would violate Al Qaeda and Taliban “due process rights.â€
Curious, isn’t it? Official terrorist groups have due process rights, but not whistleblowers, Guantanamo detainees, or ordinary Americans subject to continual surveillance by NSA.
This about that for a moment: the Pentagon is giving Al Qaeda and the Taliban funding, even though Al Qaeda and the Taliban are planning to carry out attacks on US citizens. How can this be happening? It would appear the US government is at war with their own people."
Here's Huffington post political analyst Michael Hughes:
"The U.S. has been financing both sides of the war in Afghanistan since 2001 as a startling percentage of foreign aid continues to flood Taliban coffers on a daily basis.
Some experts have estimated that close to $1 billion a year of foreign assistance has fallen into the hands of the enemy as a result of counterinsurgency programs and ill-devised USAID projects."
And of course Afghanistan has the world's largest poppy fields and so is the world's largest supplier of opium. 90 percent of all opium comes from Afghanistan...
...a drug trade which the US allows, profits off of, and which funds the Taliban and Afghan government.
Here's Michel Chossudovsky:
"Implemented in 2000-2001, the Taliban’s drug eradication program led to a 94 percent decline in opium cultivation. In 2001, according to UN figures, opium production had fallen to 185 tons. Immediately following the October 2001 US led invasion, production increased dramatically, regaining its historical levels.
Cultivation in 2006 reached a record 165,000 hectares compared with 104,000 in 2005 and 7,606 in 2001 under the Taliban (See table below).
Based on current figures, drug trafficking constitutes “the third biggest global commodity in cash terms after oil and the arms trade.†(The Independent, 29 February 2004). Afghanistan and Colombia are the largest drug producing economies in the world, which feed a flourishing criminal economy. These countries are heavily militarized. Amply documented, the CIA has played a central role in the development of both the Latin American and Afghan drug triangles."