-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 1329
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
02 Feb 2017 21:32 #334287
by ramesh
The statue of liberty is a monument to immigrants , white immigrants may I add . Where is the monument to slavery.
The statue of liberty should be renamed the statue of slavery.
One must remember that the US gov't opened the floodgates to immigration especially to eastern Europeans just after the slaves were freed . Whites were incapable of even turning a screw, since all the skilled trades were in the hands of slaves . Here again blacks were denied employment . White immigrants now had a lock on the skill trades and therefore the statue really in the eyes of blacks is a monument to slavery and oppression
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 93759
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 11430
-
Thank you received: 20
-
-
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
03 Feb 2017 09:11 #334296
by mapoui
deh shud >

>

>

the amount of interest dat m'ffer owes :

: :

: :

:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 11430
-
Thank you received: 20
-
-
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
03 Feb 2017 09:31 #334298
by mapoui
spen' too much time with zionist dicks up his arse >

>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 93759
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 93759
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
04 Feb 2017 14:38 #334426
by ketchim
IV. Under God
The ‘God’ referred to here is not the God of any particular religion
(although it is not inconsistent with God as understood in the major world religions)
Rather, it is God as referred to in the Declaration of Independence,
which speaks of “The law of nature and of nature’s God.â€
This God is the God whose moral authority underwrites natural law
and the natural rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 93759
-
Thank you received: 44
-
-
04 Feb 2017 14:59 #334431
by ketchim
First: I completely disagree with adding “under God†to The Pledge
(which occurred under the Eisenhower administration, if I remember correctly).
The founding fathers knew that :
1) doing so would undermine the separation of church and state;
2) in time, as in the present, use of the word “God†would be abused by fundamentalists
3) it alienates [excludes? betrays? insults?] secular humanists..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
Political Opinions, Commentaries on Current Issues
-
The Water Cooler!
-
Political Animal magazine
Time to create page: 0.256 seconds